"Even if Russia were behind the hack, or at least the Russian government encouraged or sponsored it (and no one would be surprised about that), merely leaking true facts about Hillary and the DNC certainly doesn’t constitute “hacking the election.” Thus far, no one has made a convincing case that the leaks decisively impacted the final outcome. And if you think about it, how could they have?
Between the slow drip of new emails from the investigations into Hillary’s private server and the long, sordid trail of scandals that have followed both her and Bill, there’s a reason Hillary’s “trustworthiness” polled abysmally low well before the DNC leaks ever came out. As my colleague Logan Albright pointed out weeks ago, ascribing Trump’s victory to Russia appears to be giving the Russians way too much credit — and the voters far too little."
https://www.conservativereview.com/commentary/2017/01/why-the-deceitful-medias-russian-election-hacking-narrative-is-misleading-and-dangerous#sthash.XsYLTBnr.dpuf
Between the slow drip of new emails from the investigations into Hillary’s private server and the long, sordid trail of scandals that have followed both her and Bill, there’s a reason Hillary’s “trustworthiness” polled abysmally low well before the DNC leaks ever came out. As my colleague Logan Albright pointed out weeks ago, ascribing Trump’s victory to Russia appears to be giving the Russians way too much credit — and the voters far too little."
https://www.conservativereview.com/commentary/2017/01/why-the-deceitful-medias-russian-election-hacking-narrative-is-misleading-and-dangerous#sthash.XsYLTBnr.dpuf